Link – Tennessee’s Greg Schiano debacle magnifies dysfunction, discord in program

What is there to say about what went down with Tennessee and Greg Schiano? Lots, apparently. I do think there was a media spin that consisted of some serious exaggeration about what we do and don’t know about Schiano’s knowledge of the Jerry Sandusky situation.

For all of those who have been pointing out that the evidence against him is hearsay, and he should be innocent until proven guilty, you’re right. It is hearsay evidence, which is why he wasn’t fired from Ohio State when the information became public, and why he hasn’t been charged with a crime or involved in any civil suits. But, there is a cloud around him, and everyone who worked with Sandusky at Penn State, because we simply don’t know who knew what, who didn’t have any idea, and who might have been silenced by those above them in the PSU hierarchy.

Personally, I think it’s that cloud along with some of the stories about things that may have happened during his time at Rutgers and with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, that makes schools think twice about having him be “the guy” in charge of the football program, which they have every right to do.

The issue here is why didn’t any of that give pause to the administration at Tennessee? Clearly they hadn’t done their homework in terms of understanding where their fans, and their legislators, would fall on the Schiano hiring scale. Doesn’t anyone there know how to float a rumor to gauge public reaction? Did they even know there was an issue with his time at Penn State that someone was going to exploit on social media? They should have known this, or at least had an inkling of it, long before they were out signing a memorandum of understanding.

Alas, it appears no one is home in Knoxville.

Photo by jmartcmu

It Might Be Bias But It’s Also a Problem with Preseason Polls

Southeastern Conference photo

By now, most of you have probably seen the Rolling Stone article in which they claim to show the bias of ESPN toward the SEC.

I’m not here to agree or disagree with the premise. There is definitely some cheer-leading going on with certain ESPN talking heads, but I don’t know that there’s an institutional bias. I think you can absolutely make the case that ESPN being an investor in the SEC network is a conflict of interest, but if there’s one thing we know about ESPN, apparent conflict of interests have never stopped them before. (They are the broadcast partners of many of the leagues they claim to “cover” from a news perspective after all!)

The one thing that the article really pointed out to me is the way that preseason polls create a real problem when it comes to ranking the teams properly.

Case in point, South Carolina was ranked #9, on the basis, I guess, of being a decent SEC team last year. When they got beat by Texas A&M in the first week of the season, the Aggies were credited with a victory over a top 10 team and rode that, and a few ridiculous non-conference wins, all the way into the top 10 themselves. As A&M lost to Mississippi State, Ole Miss and Alabama in consecutive weeks, they were all, as the article pointed out, credited with beating a “juggernaut” in A&M. But here’s the thing, A&M’s reputation this season was based on beating a South Carolina team that, in fact, stinks. They stand 4-5 after losing to Tennessee this week. (The Vols FIRST conference win by the way)

So in reality, A&M really isn’t a good college football team, nor is South Carolina. The Gamecocks, in turn, beat Georgia, who’s other loss was the embarrassment against Florida on Saturday, another team that isn’t really any good.

Now as it stands, right now, there are some teams from the SEC who are probably overated. I don’t think it is a huge problem for the final four playoff teams as of right now, but moving forward, these 4 teams are going to change, and there’s a good chance that there will be those who argue for a two-loss SEC team, because, “SEC”, when they might not be all that good, due to the teams they’ve beaten being ranked too highly at the start of the season.

As of now, Mississippi State and Florida State are undefeated, and I think if they stay that way, they deserve to be in the playoff. Going undefeated is an accomplishment in any of the Power 5 conferences. I also don’t have much of a problem with Alabama and Auburn because of a couple of impressive non-conference wins. (Bama over WVU, Auburn over K-State) But, TCU, Oregon, Baylor, Kansas State and Michigan State are right behind them. I don’t think, if everything remains the same, either one can afford a loss.

For the record, just to show that I’m not biased, the Preseason Polls also had these rankings that were ridiculous and as these teams started losing, the teams beating them were given too much credit:

#5 Ohio State (ranking was pre-injury to Braxton Miller, clearly not the reality of that team early in the season)


#9 South Carolina

#11 Stanford

#15 USC

#23 North Carolina

#24 (Coaches Poll) Texas

Let’s ditch the preseason poll, and let the teams actually show us something before we start ranking them and giving teams extra credit for quality wins that aren’t.

Photo by Diamondduste