Link – Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby wants clarity as non-league champion Ohio State Buckeyes, Washington Huskies make playoff

The Ramp

“”Obviously I acknowledge the difficulty of the task, but I’m not sure what I advise my members right now, because we’ve been telling them that nonconference schedules matter, and one of the four has an exceedingly weak nonconference schedule,” he said, referring to No. 4 Washington, which notched wins over Rutgers, Idaho and FCS Portland State. “And we’ve been telling them the 13th data point matters, and we added a conference championship game because of that. We’ve always heard that conference championships matter and division championships matter, and now it’s confusing.””

To be fair, this isn’t just sour grapes. He also acknowledges that the Big 12 didn’t really have a shot at getting a team in this year, but he would like to know what the “rules” are going to be. The Big 12 made a lot of changes to increase strength of schedule and to add a championship game next season because of how important those things were in keeping them out of the 2014 playoff, and this season they appear to not be as important.

Truthfully, there isn’t much he can do. The committee has been charged with making completely subjective decisions and those decisions are going to be driven by a lot of factors, not all of which play out on the field. Washington played a terrible schedule, but won all of those games very impressively, so they “look” like a top 4 team. Ohio State has as much talent as anyone in the country, so they “look” like a top 4 team, with only a fluky loss to Penn State on their resume.

On the other hand, Penn State beat OSU head to head and won their conference. Yes there’s that blowout loss to Michigan, and the upset by Pitt, but Clemson was upset by Pitt too, and Michigan is a top 10 team.

I realize this opinion may not be popular with my fellow Ohio State fans, but I don’t think they deserved to be in the playoff. It was true when Alabama and LSU played a rematch for the National Championship under the BCS and it’s true now, if you don’t even win your division and play in the conference championship game, you can’t possibly have proven yourself on the field to be one of the best teams on the country.

I would have put the winner of the Penn State- Wisconsin game in, Ohio State out. I would have had to leave Washington in, not because I’m a big fan of their schedule, or the strength of the PAC 12 overall, I’m not, but because no other conference champ really made for a compelling alternative to them. The Big 12 did not have a champion that stood out as being very good either, so SOS be damned, Washington is in s the 4th conference champ.

This all, however, makes for good argument fodder, which is what the NCAA really wants. They need interest in the games to increase if they expect to get better ratings than last year with the semi-finals being played on New Years Eve again. What better way than to give over half the country someone to root against like Ohio State?

Bring it. Despite my opinion, I’ll still be rooting for the Buckeyes to repeat what they did in 2014 and roll through the playoffs!

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18201632/big-12-commissioner-bob-bowlsby-wants-clarity-non-league-champion-ohio-state-buckeyes-washington-huskies-make-playoff

Playoff Chaos Again, But Will Ohio State Lose Out?

Field View from Press BoxAfter yesterdays losses by 3 of the top 4 teams in the College Football Playoff rankings, things are pretty much a mess. As it stands right now, we have unbeaten Alabama, and everyone else.

Which, is kind of what we thought we had, but with 3 other Big 5 conference teams also undefeated, the playoff picture seemed pretty simple. Now, it’s really not.

Given Ohio State’s 5th place ranking before yesterday, I’ve seen a lot of Buckeye fans celebrating, but I wouldn’t be so sure. Yes, this week OSU should get into the top 4, but can they stay there?

First, obviously, they have to beat Michigan State and Michigan.

Then, things get interesting. Unless Penn State somehow loses to either Rutgers or Michigan State, they will win the Eastern Division. They will go on to play in the Big ten Championship game, while Ohio State sits around waiting to see what happens.

Here’s the challenge. There has not yet been a team in the final four that did not win it’s conference, and for Ohio State to become the first, they need to be clearly better than two of the conference champs, and every other one-loss team.

That could be a problem.

  • Let’s assume one spot goes to Alabama.
  • Let’s also assume a one-loss Clemson wins the ACC and gets a spot.
  • Out West, if Washington wins the PAC12 with one loss? I think they’re golden.
  • In the Big 12, any of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State (2 losees each), or West Virginia (1 loss) could win it.
  • In the Big 10, Penn State may wind up playing 2 loss Wisconsin for the title.
  • Louisville could also be sitting out there with one loss.

Are you so sure the committee will still see Ohio State as one of the top four?

If Penn State wins the conference, I think they get in over OSU, they won the conference and beat them head to head. In that case, I think 11-2 beats 11-1. Wisconsin would be a tougher call, does the committee value winning the conference, or OSU’s OT win over Wisconsin? Either way, I’m not feeling super confident that OSU gets in over the winner of their own conference.

That means OSU has to be clearly better than the PAC12 and Big12 winners, and hope the committee values their SOS more than Louisville, who may only have a close loss to another playoff team on it’s resume, just like Ohio State would if PSU wins the conference and gets into the playoff.

If you’re a Buckeye fan, here’s what you’re rooting for:

  • A Louisville loss to Houston, or a Clemson loss in the ACC championship.
  • Washington State or USC to win the PAC12. Preferably as a 3 loss team!
  • Oklahoma to win the Big!2 – That early, dominate, win in Norman would be hard for the committee to ignore.

See how much simpler the path to the playoff was before Michigan lost? We can’t ever count on them… 😉

Do you think OSU gets in? How do you think this will play out over the next three weeks?

Link – Ohio State’s Greg Schiano, UCLA’s Tom Bradley knew of Jerry Sandusky’s abuse while at Penn State

In the newly released testimony from ex-Penn State assistant Mike McQueary in 2015, separate from his key testimony in Sandusky’s criminal trial, it was revealed new Ohio State defensive coordinator Greg Schiano and UCLA defensive coordinator Tom Bradley also knew about Sandusky’s transgressions while they were assistants at Penn State.

This is not good. If true, while I am unsure of what laws would have been in place at the time regarding mandatory reporting, both of them failed at being human beings.

Schiano has since denied knowing anything about abuse.

http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/news/jerry-sandusky-abuse-greg-schiano-tom-bradley-knew-ohio-state-ucla-joe-paterno-penn-state/wencvpvsq0re1g7k04knmeql3

Ridiculous Conclusions After the First Saturday of College Football

IMG_0290.JPG

It’s been one week. Actually, it hasn’t even been one week since Ohio State and Virginia Tech play tomorrow. But after the first few days of the season, a few things seem pretty clear.

  • BYU had the play of the day, but also lost Taysom Hill to a season ending injury, again. Kid can’t catch a break.
  • Notre Dame may or may not be very good, but it is clear that Texas is not.
  • The SEC took care of business, aside from Vandy. Mostly against over-matched competition, but Bama and A&M both put up good wins against ranked teams, and Auburn beat a pretty decent Louisville team, albeit with a lot of help from Bobby Petrino’s confusing clock management.
  • The PAC-12 and BIG-10 wanted to brag about having caught the SEC coming into the season, but both conferences had a bunch of L’s after week one, some of which were fairly inexcusable. (see Temple, Portland State, Hawaii, and Marshall)
  • Speaking of that Temple win, can Christian Hackenberg sue PSU for ruining his pro draft potential with that offensive line?
  • A lot of other teams played games that told us nothing because of the competition, others because they were sloppy and rusty.
  • Was it just me or were there a lot of true freshman playing QB? A few due to injury, others just because. That will not help the previous point about sloppiness.
  • LSU cancelled their game against McNeese State after lightning storms delayed the start until past midnight. For some reason, the lack of hotel space in Baton Rouge meant the game could not be played Sunday or Monday, despite the fact that the schools are only about a 2 hour drive apart. I don’t get it.
  • Stanford might have been a tad overrated, or Northwestern might be a lot better than we think.
  • K-State’s band < Ohio State’s band. OSU at least kept the vulgarities off the field. 😉

Seriously, it’s been one game for most schools now and as we know all too well from last season, teams get better as the season progresses. Teams that look woeful and sloppy in the first couple of games can go on to dominate at the end, and teams that dominate against lesser competition early in the year, can prove to be pretty average by the time the season ends. I’m not reading much into the results of Saturday’s games, but they all count, so slipping up this early can make for quite a mountain to climb to get back to where you want to go, and the same thing holds true every single week. That’s what makes it so fun to watch!

What caught your eye during the games this week?

NCAA Can’t Help But Corrupt Everything

I often wonder if the NCAA can do anything without some sort of corruption, and now we learn that it couldn’t even let the “independent” investigator looking into the Penn State – Jerry Sandusky case be, you know, independent.

 

Court documents filed in Pennsylvania show that the NCAA and investigators from a firm hired by Penn State University to conduct a wholly independent investigation of the university’s handling of the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal worked closely in the investigation.

So, apparently, the answer to my question remains no.